04-03-2014, 05:05 AM
(04-03-2014, 03:45 AM)Arakash Wrote: I suspect that this is true and actually a reflection of real life challenges during design processes.
Its not necessarily possible to integrate every new development/advancement into a design that is already partly complete without sacrificing more time.
Its probably a lot worse in tech fields that change very rapidly.
Yes and no. Spending more time on development of a car is in 95% of cases going to result in a better, more modern car with fewer problems. Obviously within reason.
Mercedes cut their development cycle (as in, time spent on completing one model including it's numerous engine, gearbox and interior layouts) from 7 years back to 4 years in the mid 90's and as a result had major quality problems for a couple of generations. The shorter development time had a significant effect on the refinement and readiness of their finished cars. They've refined the process now and ironed out most of the kinks but they're still not as far ahead of everyone else as they used to be, not by a long shot. Their prices are now mostly based off the name they developed during the years they spend 7 years making sure a car was ready.