01-09-2026, 10:03 PM
I’d like to bring up a discussion topic, purely to hear different perspectives — this is not a proposal or a request.
Eric has mentioned before that the current FBS bounty amounts are relatively low compared to the actual workload and general market rates, which is also why pausing or wrapping things up has been considered.
I was wondering whether, if keeping FBS active were the goal, there might be another possible approach — for example:
I’m genuinely curious how people feel about this in principle:
Would this be something you personally find acceptable, or would you rather keep things as they are now, or see FBS conclude instead?
Again, this is only meant as an open discussion to understand how people feel, not to suggest or push for any specific outcome.
Sorry for my poor english.
Eric has mentioned before that the current FBS bounty amounts are relatively low compared to the actual workload and general market rates, which is also why pausing or wrapping things up has been considered.
I was wondering whether, if keeping FBS active were the goal, there might be another possible approach — for example:
- Increasing the bounty amount per milestone
- While accepting a slower development pace and longer wait times
I’m genuinely curious how people feel about this in principle:
Would this be something you personally find acceptable, or would you rather keep things as they are now, or see FBS conclude instead?
Again, this is only meant as an open discussion to understand how people feel, not to suggest or push for any specific outcome.
Sorry for my poor english.