Posts: 509
Threads: 105
Joined: Jan 2014
Reputation:
1
Votes: 0✔
Well I'll be jiggered! I did not know that!
He did at least have the advantage of having worked out how to run a substantially more efficient production line than any of his opposition though.... Or am I wrong again? LOL
Posts: 40
Threads: 12
Joined: Jan 2014
Reputation:
1
Votes: 0✔
I'd say your right. But what he did would probably be the equivalent of a Level 3 or Level 4 factory by that point which, while not impossible, is certainly quite a feat to get to that point, no?
Posts: 3,856
Threads: 825
Joined: Jul 2011
Reputation:
17
Votes: 0✔
It's debatable what Ford did well.
The vehicles were not the cheapest, most reliable, or the highest qualities.
The assembly line method attributed to Ford played a roll in the beginning however by 1912 everyone was doing it.
A lot of people point to the fact Ford paid higher wages than anyone else. This lead to two things, talent retention, and the low end workers could actually afford what they're making. So if you worked at Ford, you bought a Ford. A tickle down, trickle up effect.
"great writers are indecent people, they live unfairly, saving the best part for paper.
good human beings save the world, so that bastards like me can keep creating art, become immortal.
if you read this after I am dead it means I made it." ― Charles Bukowski